snurri: (Default)
snurri ([personal profile] snurri) wrote2008-11-23 09:19 pm

Proof That Novelists Have Been Getting Tired of Naming Minor Characters Since At Least 1872

"the fine old-blooded idiocy of young Lord Tapir, and the furious gouty humors of old Lord Megatherium"

- Middlemarch, George (Mary Ann) Eliot (Evans Cross)

[identity profile] ninstorage.livejournal.com 2008-11-24 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
Teehee.

(on a not so unrelated note, I love that novel!)

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-11-24 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm liking it a lot so far. It feels oddly contemporary in some ways; I think it's that it reads as very self-aware.

[identity profile] ninstorage.livejournal.com 2008-12-03 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I kept meaning to post this quote in relation to Middlemarch but kept forgetting; it's by Iris Murdoch whom, in writing about novel-writing and the Sublime referred to Eliot's organic way of dealing w/ novels. Murdoch admired this.

Hennyway:


"A novel must be a house fit for free characters to live in; and to combine form with a respect for reality with all its odd contingent ways is the highest art of prose"

The article's title is "The Sublime and The Beautiful Revisited". It can be found in the anthology
"Existentialists and Mystics" but it can also be found in the Yale Review, December, 1959.

Which is, to me, almost perfect in terms of a storytelling ethos.