snurri: (Default)
snurri ([personal profile] snurri) wrote2008-06-24 12:41 pm

I Dare You To Find a Narrative In This Entry

From Aftenposten (which finally has both an RSS feed and select articles in English): Heirs to the Scandinavian thrones study the Arctic. If we have to live in a world with kings and queens, I think they ought to be doing stuff like this. Even though it's probably all an excuse to party under the midnight sun.

Speaking of monarchies, I just re-read The Hobbit for the first time in twenty years. I've never had any illusions about the fact that The Lord of the Rings has an inordinate amount of faith in demonstrably flawed monarchies, but I was particularly struck by how scornful Tolkien is of the Lakemen's attempt at democracy. He's very eager to remind us that the corrupt Master was elected by the townspeople, and to replace him with the restored monarchy under Bard. Which, I'm sorry, is the lamest name for a character ever. My next book will be about a guy named Druid and a woman named Amazon.

Speaking of being metaphorically struck by things, I recently watched Nosferatu, which was interesting for many reasons. Two have stayed with me, though, and one is that watching Nosferatu is a great cure for my insomnia. The other is that I wonder if the Ferengi were based on the Dracula of that film, because the resemblance is pretty fucking eerie.

Speaking of resemblances, I'm making another attempt at The Uses of Enchantment. Oh Bruno Bettelheim, I am almost entirely sympathetic to your arguments, but Freudian theory does not map onto every goddamn thing in the universe. Seriously. Also, fuck you for the "refrigerator mothers" thing.

Speaking of abrupt transitions, Deb Layne has posted the Polyphony 7 TOC. Howard Waldrop! Steve Rasnic Tem! And many other legends-to-be! Awesome.

Speaking of legends, I totally want this Lego Death Star set. Of course, it's $400 so I shall just continue to want. I think my life is lacking in Legos, currently.

Speaking of missing things, I flaked on the second episode of The Middleman last night. Hopefully they will replay it next Monday. I'm not 100% sold on this show, but the "'Barry Allen or Wally West?' 'Do you want me to leave?'" exchange pretty much made up for the gorilla suits. Also, Natalie Morales is so very cute. So kill me.

Speaking of me, there's no chance of getting through this entry without talking about the book. On the blog front, it's gotten some recent nice mentions from Nathan Blumenfeld, Barth Anderson, Deb Layne, and a fellow named Martin. Yay!

Speaking of happiness, the Twins seem to be back on track for the moment. They tend to beat up on the National League every year, so that's not a big shock; still, it was getting depressing there for a while. And, seriously, Delmon Young? WORST. OUTFIELDER. EVER. I don't care if he jacks one out of the park every once in a while, he's cost three times as many runs as he's driven in. Send him away until he learns how to catch the damn ball; they can't be out of options yet.

Speaking of failures, I was thinking about how the recent Buffy and Angel comics have been pretty good, and every Firefly/Serenity comic they've done has sucked ass. I don't know what that's about, but I'm open to theories.

[identity profile] glvalentine.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
This episode won't 100% sell you either, but there's enough there to hold out for. (Plus, it's episode 104 airing as episode 2, so a lot of the, "Uh, it's a little soon to be hitting us with this" issues are just scheduling bumps.)

And Natalie Morales just...makes this show. Hilarious.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
She does. Her delivery is pitch-perfect, and the rest of the cast is, as of yet, only aspiring to be on her level.

Also, girls in shirts and suits and ties are a particular weakness of mine.

[identity profile] glvalentine.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. I think Matt Keesler is settling into a role that's pretty hard to inahbit sometimes, so kudos there, but man, Wendy Watson rules.

I love her outfit except for her pants! Like, are they tights? Are they pants? The girl's in tants right now and it makes me crazy not knowing!

(Love her jacket, though. And her constant Picard-maneuvering of said jacket.)

[identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
You can come over and play with our Legos if you want. We've been keeping them in the library, ostensibly for our younger friends but really for everybody.

(I am not completely kidding about this. It would be nice to see you again, and secondarily it would be nice to see my books again, too. This whole me-not-driving thing: I find it inconvenient.)

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I completely suck for keeping your books for so long! In actual fact I have not finished all of them (a little more than half of them, I think), but I would be pleased to hang out. I had thought perhaps I would see you at the convention, but then I ended up not going and hence did not see you. FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS.

[identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
You should totally come next year, though. I really think it'd be your sort of thing.

Anyway, if you have some ideas for how we could manage this hanging out thing, my e-mail's where it's always been. I've been sort of sheepishly admitting to people all weekend that I have great difficulty asking people to do social stuff when I can't do any of the work, and since I can't drive and can't cook...yah. Not really at my social best at the moment. But still interested in working around that stuff to see friends and cordial acquaintances and like that.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a couple of ideas, but since both of them involve other people's cars I will have to get back to you on them. Will let you know soon!

[identity profile] mrissa.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
If you come up dry on that, let me know, and I will talk to other, more driving sorts of people around here, too.

[identity profile] le-trombone.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
... but Freudian theory does not map onto every goddamn thing in the universe.

Heh. By the time I read it in the eighties, it became apparent that Freudian theory mapped onto nothing in the universe. Difficult book to read because of that, and it didn't help when the revelations of Bettelheim's abuse to his pupils came out after his death.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't heard about the abuse; that's distressing.

I guess I'm reading the book more or less as literary theory, and since fairy tales are ripe for interpretation via so many different systems at times the arguments don't seem that crazy. But then there are the times when he's arguing about how toads are the id, and I'm like, um no.

[identity profile] janradder.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Arie and Éiden watch the Super Friends. My two favorite bad guys are Dr. Cranum, who increases the size of his brain, and Dictor, who attempts to take over the universe. I love the subtlety.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't there a character on the Venture Bros called Doctor Girlfriend? Now THAT is on-the-nose.

[identity profile] janradder.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen that show but I love the name.

Nosferatu

[identity profile] scarypudding.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I've never seen it, but did you see that John Malkovich / Willem Dafoe movie about the making of? It's badly flawed, but it's got some great bits, and I imagine it'd be more fun having seen the original.

Re: Nosferatu

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, "Shadow of the Vampire." I enjoyed that more than I enjoyed "Nosferatu," although I am glad I finally saw it.

[identity profile] infinitehotel.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I really hoped I could enjoy the Buffy comics, but so far they've left me flat, even the Season 8 stuff. The thing that made Buffy so good was that it was a comic book on television, done well. A comic book about a television show that was basically a braindump of Whedon's comics geek brain doesn't have the same novelty. It feels like it's all been done before and better.

I've had mixed feelings about his X-men stuff as well, but I've enjoyed reading it more than any of his other comics.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
It's been a bit up and down for me, but I'm enjoying them. My current theory is that Buffy and Angel were on long enough for me to internalize the actor's performances, whereas with Serenity/Firefly I miss Fillion/Torres/Staite etc. too much.

legos and serenity comics

[identity profile] rsheslin.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Every Lego set, ever.

As far as the Serenity comics,

[I guess I should head this with "Vaguely Spoileriffic, But Only About Ongoing Themes/Recurring Stuff That Happens Over And Over Again In The Series"]



although the last one was kind of "eh, whatever," it actually really helped me come to terms with one of the running themes of the show. See, the thing I hated about Cowboy Bebop was that they never got a break, financially. If I'd originally seen Firefly on TV in the messed-up order shown, I'd have dumped it immediately. However, since I first saw it on DVD, I was inordinately happy that they actually got paid -- but it still irritated me that, after that, they seemed to always lose whatever they'd gotten. The comic made me feel a lot better about it, because being perpetually broke meant something to Mal.

Re: legos and serenity comics

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
WOW on the Lego stuff. I want that.

What you've picked out about the difference between Firefly and Cowboy Bebop is actually my biggest problem with the most recent series. It was just too much for me to believe that he would not only get rid of all that cash, but that the crew would let him. If the characters never get a break, then you don't have to hit the reset button like that.

Re: serenity comics

[identity profile] rsheslin.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah... it's like when Zoe gathered up their entire haul to pay the ransom -- what, you couldn't hold onto a few hundred quid for expenses?

But (as psych major) I could actually buy that Mal would want to stay broke for fear that, if the crew were rich, they'd leave him. After all, IIRC, it's not like he simply handed the money to someone else; it was stolen from them, and I could see how he wouldn't be as motivated to fight to get it back (although, yes, it was a rather ridiculous amount that was at stake.)

Re: serenity comics

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Within the confines of the plot I understood the reasons for it; but the fact that it was constructed that way was so manipulative that I was sort of disgusted. Mal's hard enough to like (although I do) without having him be the cause, conscious or un-, of keeping everyone poor and on the run.

[identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking about how the recent Buffy and Angel comics have been pretty good,

You mistyped, "how the recent Buffy comic has been pretty good and the recent Angel comic has been a horrible travesty that trampled over five years of good memories."

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh. Um. Well, the art in the Angel series had to grow on me, but I feel like the storytelling has been pretty good overall. I like what they're doing with Angel himself, and I feel like once we get over the initial story bumps (which, granted, you'd think would be over with 8-9 issues in) it'll find its feet.

[identity profile] justinhowe.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)
You are so wrong about Nosferatu that the angels are crying. What time did you start watching it?

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
To hell with the angels!

I dunno, 7 or so? It wasn't anywhere near my bedtime, I can tell you that for sure.

There were aspects of it that I thought were interesting, but having a) seen various of the more interesting bits in clips over the years and b) already watched "Shadow of the Vampire," there wasn't much new about it. I will say that the quality of the DVD was pretty crappy, so a restored print might have been more enjoyable. But mostly I was trying to keep myself interested by tracking the differences between Stoker's Dracula and the adaptation.

[identity profile] justinhowe.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Damn. I love that movie. I love that movie in so many ways... it's actually a bit disturbing. The KINO print is the best I know of. It has a great orchestrial score.

But damn... yeah, damn... I guess I am an even bigger film dork than I suspected.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
The score was good, I'll grant you that. It looks like this version was done by "Westlake," and it was pretty bad; corners shaded out, some of the text running off the screen, etc.

I think part of it is that I'm not very keyed into the silent film mode. I've seen a few of them, and I find them interesting for historical reasons, but I think that with film my sensibilities are pretty modernized and so I am hard to please.

[identity profile] justinhowe.livejournal.com 2008-06-25 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah -- that's the thing, Nosferatu is one of the few silent movies that holds up to modern standards. I guess it just ain't modern enough for you crazy kids.