snurri: (Default)
snurri ([personal profile] snurri) wrote2008-09-25 02:44 am

Reasons I Should Go To Bed Earlier, #3,882

'Cause I end up wandering around IMDb and find out they're doing a remake of The Taking of Pelham 123.

Just, no.

In protest I plan to buy the original and force you all to watch it when you visit me in the asylum.

[identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 09:14 am (UTC)(link)
They are doing a another remake.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
*Grumbles.*

[identity profile] bluetyson.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 10:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, there should be a special hell for movie idiots who remake REALLY GOOD movies.

Nothing wrong with remaking crappy ones, but sheesh.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, I understand that Hollywood has always cannibalized itself, but cripes. I thought it was bad when they redid Assault on Precinct 13.

[identity profile] veejane.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 11:06 am (UTC)(link)
If you own the jazz soundtrack, I will love you forever.

[identity profile] mastadge.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 11:08 am (UTC)(link)
I own it. But that's not the same.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
DAMMIT MISSED JANE'S ETERNAL LOVE BY THAT MUCH.

[identity profile] vee-ecks.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh, it already got a remake like ten years ago, and this did not cause the original to whither and blow away like one of the podded people in the first version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Or was that the second? Or the third? I dunno, they're all pretty good, but remakes are still evil, I guess.

[identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, if I don't obsess about the plunder of '70s cinema I'll have to focus on things like the collapse of the economy or the impending end of the world.