In Which I Am a Scary Movie Wuss
Oct. 7th, 2010 01:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I think it's time that I admit to myself that I don't enjoy horror movies.
The problem with that statement, of course, is that "horror" is too imprecise a term. Is "Alien" horror? Is "Evil Dead 2," or "Scream"? Is "Silence of the Lambs," or even "The Talented Mr. Ripley"? I enjoy all of those films. But ED2 and "Scream" are really comedies, and the latter two lack the unpredictability of a supernatural or SF element. I'm not sure why "Alien" is an exception for me--maybe because I've seen it enough times now that I don't get tense watching it.
'Cause that's primarily the trouble. Scary movies make me tense and worried, and I don't enjoy that. That's more or less my default setting, anyway, and these films just make it worse. I like suspense, but I don't like going into a film knowing that people are going to get splattered and just waiting for it to happen. (And yet I'm not nearly as bothered by shoot-em-up flicks, so go figure.) There's also the fact that a lot of horror movies rely on slimy, oozy, dripping things, and I dislike those things enough that I'm always worried I'm going to puke. I haven't, to date--the closest I came was after the bit in "RoboCop" (not a horror movie) where the guy gets the barrel of toxic waste dumped over him and then splashes apart when the car hits him--but I'm always sitting there worrying that this is going to be the one that makes me hurl.
I watched "Slither" the other night, and it's a great movie, really funny, smart, excellent cast, really well done. But I didn't really enjoy it. I couldn't relax. Slugs, people. Ish. I spent the whole time clenched up on the edge of the couch. It was the same with "The Descent" (except for the slugs), which is objectively an incredible film, and one that I don't think I'd ever watch again. (The fact that I'm mildly claustrophobic may have something to do with this.) These are both good horror movies, I think, and I failed to get much enjoyment out of them. I think they're good, though, because they had me scared; the horror movies that don't scare me mostly feel like a waste of my time. That's how I felt about "The Ring" (the Japanese original), which I saw recently; I was intrigued, and mildly creeped out at the end, but ultimately felt like there wasn't much point to it. The only exception that's coming to mind right now is "Let the Right One In" (the original Swedish version), which was a well-made horror film that I really enjoyed and would definitely watch again. It's pretty up-front about what it is, though, and it's not gross (I guess movie blood doesn't bother me much). Again, I don't know how useful a term "horror" really is.
Maybe this is like Lovecraft; they say that if you read him at around age 14 you'll be a fan of his forever, and if you miss that window you'll never get it. I didn't read Lovecraft until my 20s, and I must have missed my window for horror flicks, too; I guess I was about 12 when I got too scared by "An American Werewolf in London" to watch the whole thing, and I kind of missed that whole '80s horror boom. I went back to watch some of them later--I sort of like "Halloween," because it's a really technically smart film--but most of them do nothing for me except wind me up and leave me wondering what the point is.
I guess the reason I care is that my experiences with "Slither" and "The Descent" are proof that there are really good horror movies of that type, but I don't know if I'll ever be able to enjoy them. Maybe if I got really drunk? That would seem to increase the danger of puking, though. Do y'all enjoy being scared by these things? Do I just need to medicate, or what?
The problem with that statement, of course, is that "horror" is too imprecise a term. Is "Alien" horror? Is "Evil Dead 2," or "Scream"? Is "Silence of the Lambs," or even "The Talented Mr. Ripley"? I enjoy all of those films. But ED2 and "Scream" are really comedies, and the latter two lack the unpredictability of a supernatural or SF element. I'm not sure why "Alien" is an exception for me--maybe because I've seen it enough times now that I don't get tense watching it.
'Cause that's primarily the trouble. Scary movies make me tense and worried, and I don't enjoy that. That's more or less my default setting, anyway, and these films just make it worse. I like suspense, but I don't like going into a film knowing that people are going to get splattered and just waiting for it to happen. (And yet I'm not nearly as bothered by shoot-em-up flicks, so go figure.) There's also the fact that a lot of horror movies rely on slimy, oozy, dripping things, and I dislike those things enough that I'm always worried I'm going to puke. I haven't, to date--the closest I came was after the bit in "RoboCop" (not a horror movie) where the guy gets the barrel of toxic waste dumped over him and then splashes apart when the car hits him--but I'm always sitting there worrying that this is going to be the one that makes me hurl.
I watched "Slither" the other night, and it's a great movie, really funny, smart, excellent cast, really well done. But I didn't really enjoy it. I couldn't relax. Slugs, people. Ish. I spent the whole time clenched up on the edge of the couch. It was the same with "The Descent" (except for the slugs), which is objectively an incredible film, and one that I don't think I'd ever watch again. (The fact that I'm mildly claustrophobic may have something to do with this.) These are both good horror movies, I think, and I failed to get much enjoyment out of them. I think they're good, though, because they had me scared; the horror movies that don't scare me mostly feel like a waste of my time. That's how I felt about "The Ring" (the Japanese original), which I saw recently; I was intrigued, and mildly creeped out at the end, but ultimately felt like there wasn't much point to it. The only exception that's coming to mind right now is "Let the Right One In" (the original Swedish version), which was a well-made horror film that I really enjoyed and would definitely watch again. It's pretty up-front about what it is, though, and it's not gross (I guess movie blood doesn't bother me much). Again, I don't know how useful a term "horror" really is.
Maybe this is like Lovecraft; they say that if you read him at around age 14 you'll be a fan of his forever, and if you miss that window you'll never get it. I didn't read Lovecraft until my 20s, and I must have missed my window for horror flicks, too; I guess I was about 12 when I got too scared by "An American Werewolf in London" to watch the whole thing, and I kind of missed that whole '80s horror boom. I went back to watch some of them later--I sort of like "Halloween," because it's a really technically smart film--but most of them do nothing for me except wind me up and leave me wondering what the point is.
I guess the reason I care is that my experiences with "Slither" and "The Descent" are proof that there are really good horror movies of that type, but I don't know if I'll ever be able to enjoy them. Maybe if I got really drunk? That would seem to increase the danger of puking, though. Do y'all enjoy being scared by these things? Do I just need to medicate, or what?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 06:51 pm (UTC)I saw Alien once. Never again.
Ditto for The Shining.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 06:55 pm (UTC)Big ups for "Shaun of the Dead," though, especially the first half.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-09 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 08:03 pm (UTC)Also - if RoboCop made you nauseous, you can never, EVER see Cronenberg's remake of The Fly. You will barf and pass out, maybe all at once. I'm serious.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 08:19 pm (UTC)Yeah, "Aliens" is tense. Still, most everybody is carrying guns, so most of the time I don't get too worried about them :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 08:31 pm (UTC)[::giggles::]
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-09 06:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 08:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 11:03 pm (UTC)"Jaws" and "The Wizard of Oz", however, scare the pants off of me.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:34 pm (UTC)I was never too scared by "The Wizard of Oz," but "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" scared the hell out of me as a kid and still gives me a major case of the creeps.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 11:07 pm (UTC)"I'm 12, but I've been 12 for a really long time."
Not an urban fantasy vampire, or a romantic fantasy vampire, this lass is dangerous. But mostly the horror comes from the implications of the situation. It's a layered film with tons of nuance.
Just thought I'd help you become even more disturbed at what the world can pull on us. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-07 11:25 pm (UTC)I totally agree.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:26 am (UTC)Entertainment should be enjoyable. There's nothing wrong with skipping stuff that makes you uncomfortable. At the store, people sometimes try to convince me to read something scary. I just tell them nope, I find real life plenty scary, and I read to get away from that!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:39 pm (UTC)And you're completely right that we should read what we enjoy. I like to push myself out of my comfort zone, though, and I've found stuff I enjoy out there.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-10 11:58 pm (UTC)Scary books or stories, I'm willing, but there has to be something besides scary to them. Christopher Fowler's Peculiar Crimes Unit mysteries have horrific murders, described in loving detail, but those are surrounded by one of my all-time favorite crime-solving teams and the lore and history of the city of London. Tanya Huff and Mike Carey both write urban fantasy with horrific elements, but with interesting characters and a sense of humor.
And I like the resolution to leave me feeling relaxed, not apprehensive.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 03:30 am (UTC)The one that typifies what I'm glad I saw but will never watch again is Oldboy.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 04:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 04:10 am (UTC)Because the blob might get me.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 06:25 am (UTC)I've discovered that while I enjoy thrillers (Die Hard and so forth), I don't like suspense films, and horror movies tend to be suspense films rather than thrillers. The tension gets me all wound up, and then so often it's not released in a good way, but in a terrifying way. Makes me unhappy.
It took me years to realize that I could enjoy Terminator because it was a thriller rather than a horror flick.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 01:43 pm (UTC)I love "Die Hard." Such a great movie.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-08 06:29 pm (UTC)I'm writing a piece on early sixties horror movies, specifically The Haunting, The Innocents, Carnival of Souls, Night Tide & Eyes Without a Face. I'll also touch on several other key horror movies from '60-'63: Black Sunday (Bava), Brides of Dracula (Hammer), Psycho, Haunted Palace (Corman/Vincent Price), Fall of the House of Usher (Corman/Price/Poe) and Burn, Witch Burn (based on Fritz Leiber's Conjure Wife).
But the movies I'm focusing on constitute a different tradition. Stephen King specifically cites The Haunting as a movie which deals in Terror instead of Horror (which by his taxonomy involves something disquieting happening to the physical body) or Revulsion (aka, The Gross Out).
All of the movies I'm looking at derive from a combination of Val Lewton's RKO films (Cat People etc.), Cocteau's surreal dream films and the psychological ghost story of "The Turn of the Screw" (The Innocents is an adaptation of the Henry James.)
They're also very much about female identity, the fear (and also attraction) of losing one's self. (I'm thinking of titling it: "I, Without a Face.")