![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
snurriBooks 1-10.
Books 11-20.
Books 21-30.
Books 31-40.
Books 41-50.
Books 51-60.
Books 61-70.
Books 71-80.
Books 81-90.
91. Over the Earth I Come: The Great Sioux Uprising of 1862 by Duane Schultz.
92. Ripley Under Ground by Patricia Highsmith.
93. The Ant King and Other Stories by Benjamin Rosenbaum.
94. The Wind's Twelve Quarters by Ursula K. Le Guin.
95. Ripley's Game by Patricia Highsmith.
96. A Fisherman of the Inland Sea: Stories by Ursula K. Le Guin. More stories, mostly quite good, a few good but not too memorable. Standouts, for me, were "Newton's Sleep," "The Rock That Changed Things," and "The Shobies' Story," the last of which is seriously unsettling. I think I would prefer not to mess with churten travel, thanks. The title story starts out feeling sort of like just reading someone's slightly rambly life story and then suddenly turns into something much more boggling; in retrospect it seems clear that it was structured that way for a reason, and it's an interesting, risky choice. It worked for me, ultimately, but I could see where it might not for another reader.
Books 11-20.
Books 21-30.
Books 31-40.
Books 41-50.
Books 51-60.
Books 61-70.
Books 71-80.
Books 81-90.
91. Over the Earth I Come: The Great Sioux Uprising of 1862 by Duane Schultz.
92. Ripley Under Ground by Patricia Highsmith.
93. The Ant King and Other Stories by Benjamin Rosenbaum.
94. The Wind's Twelve Quarters by Ursula K. Le Guin.
95. Ripley's Game by Patricia Highsmith.
96. A Fisherman of the Inland Sea: Stories by Ursula K. Le Guin. More stories, mostly quite good, a few good but not too memorable. Standouts, for me, were "Newton's Sleep," "The Rock That Changed Things," and "The Shobies' Story," the last of which is seriously unsettling. I think I would prefer not to mess with churten travel, thanks. The title story starts out feeling sort of like just reading someone's slightly rambly life story and then suddenly turns into something much more boggling; in retrospect it seems clear that it was structured that way for a reason, and it's an interesting, risky choice. It worked for me, ultimately, but I could see where it might not for another reader.