(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] timakers.livejournal.com
How long til Alabama and South Carolina follow suit?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
I'd think Vermont would beat both to the punch.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:06 pm (UTC)
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)
From: [personal profile] cofax7
Hmm. I'd wait until it's clear whether this is just a publicity stunt; in fact I'm pretty sure it is. The Lakota make up several different tribes and you'd have to get the political leadership of each tribe to sign off on it, and that wouldn't have happened without a lot more publicity, so... nothing's going to happen. Plus, Congress has plenary authority over the tribes, which they reject, but...

Sorry to be a wet-blanket, and thanks for the link.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
Well, I wasn't quite that serious. It's an attractive notion, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:18 pm (UTC)
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)
From: [personal profile] cofax7
Well, yeah, except I think I'd wait a good ten years until they got all the infrastructure properly funded and scaled up to support the influx of immigrants. *g*

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
At least someone's being practical :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 09:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] susansugarspun.livejournal.com
The article does say that they've been working on this for over thirty years, though. They may not be prepared to (or want to) accept a lot of immigrants, but I'm actually inclined to think they're more serious than just a publicity stunt.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-20 09:39 pm (UTC)
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)
From: [personal profile] cofax7
Well, I believe they're serious. But Russell Means isn't, so far as I know, a member of any Lakota tribal council. A group of people declaring seccession doesn't a seccession make.

In other words, there's no legal effect here. Just political. Which is fine, as far as it goes--but I suspect the various tribal councils would like to have a say before giving up their IHS benefits, for instance.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-21 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yswilce.livejournal.com
If it didn't work for South Carolina, I don't think it's gonna work for them either. But good luck to them anyway...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-01 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haddayr.livejournal.com
As far as I know, Russell Means isn't in the leadership of any Lakota tribe, and thus does not have the right to say this.

He's right, though; we continue to break treaties repeatedly. Our own proud state is doing so with not only the Lakotah, but also the Ojibwe.

GO PAWLENTY! USA! USA! USA! USA!

Profile

snurri: (Default)
snurri

April 2011

S M T W T F S
      12
345 6 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags