(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-flea-king.livejournal.com
Good wow or bad wow?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
Well, good. I didn't love the book, but it was a great concept, and the Coen Bros. are an automatic wow in my book.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamiam.livejournal.com
Um, wow.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
I already said that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamiam.livejournal.com
It needed to be said again.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarypudding.livejournal.com
Fucking. Awesome.

I suppose it'd be too much to ask...

Date: 2008-02-12 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarypudding.livejournal.com
...for them to actually film the Yiddish parts in Yiddish.

Re: I suppose it'd be too much to ask...

Date: 2008-02-12 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
With subtitles or something? They should TOTALLY do that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I'm not convinced the strengths of the Coens and the strengths of Chabon are as good a fit as the strengths of the Coens and the strengths of McCarthy. But then, I'm a bit of a Coens agnostic anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-12 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snurri.livejournal.com
They've stumbled a couple of times, so I'm not of the they-can-do-no-wrong mindset; but I think that the low-key humor of the book is a great fit for them. The noir aspect, too. It'll be interesting to see.

Profile

snurri: (Default)
snurri

April 2011

S M T W T F S
      12
345 6 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags